Leber congenital amaurosis: genes and variants

Leber congenital amaurosis is linked to 6 analyzed proteins (CRB1, RPE65, CRX, CEP290, ALMS1 and ABCA4). 183 DNA variants are known to cause it; 947 more are uncertain, and 15 of those already look disease-causing on computable evidence.

Last updated 2026-09-30. Research information, not medical advice.

Also known as: Leber congenital amaurosis 1; Leber congenital amaurosis 10; Leber congenital amaurosis 2; Leber congenital amaurosis 7; Leber congenital amaurosis 8

Genes linked to Leber congenital amaurosis

Weakly linked (only a few uncertain records): PDE6B and WDR19.

Where Leber congenital amaurosis variants cluster

Known disease-causing variants in Leber congenital amaurosis

VariantPositionProtein partClinical label
CRX R41Q41HomeoboxDisease-causing (★★★★)
CRB1 D1005V1005Laminin G-like 3Disease-causing (★★★★)
CRB1 G333R333EGF-like 8Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C450Y450EGF-like 11Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G477R477EGF-like 11Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G685A685EGF-like 12Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 T745K745Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G833R833Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G850V850Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C939G939EGF-like 14Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C948R948EGF-like 14Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 P1305L1305EGF-like 19Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C1321G1321EGF-like 19Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 E1403Q1403Interaction with EPB41L5Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C195F195EGF-like 5Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C480S480EGF-like 11Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C480R480EGF-like 11Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 M741T741Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 T745M745Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G850S850Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C948Y948EGF-like 14Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 S1006F1006Laminin G-like 3Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 L1107P1107Laminin G-like 3Disease-causing (★★)
CRX R40Q40HomeoboxDisease-causing (★★)
CRX R40W40HomeoboxDisease-causing (★★)
CRX R41W41HomeoboxDisease-causing (★★)
CRX R43H43HomeoboxDisease-causing (★★)
CRX R43C43HomeoboxDisease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C152Y152EGF-like 4Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C383Y383EGF-like 9Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C450R450EGF-like 11Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C450S450EGF-like 11Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 D564Y564Laminin G-like 1Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G615V615Laminin G-like 1Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C681Y681EGF-like 12Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 E710V710ExtracellularDisease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G750V750Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G833D833Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G834D834Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G846R846Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C1148R1148EGF-like 15Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C1163F1163EGF-like 15Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C1165R1165EGF-like 15Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C1294Y1294EGF-like 18Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 E1403D1403Interaction with EPB41L5Disease-causing (★★)
RPE65 G32C32Disease-causing (★★)
RPE65 G40D40Disease-causing (★★)
RPE65 H180Q180Disease-causing (★★)
RPE65 L408P408Disease-causing (★★)
RPE65 E417G417Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 I852T852Laminin G-like 2Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 S1006Y1006Laminin G-like 3Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 I1100T1100Laminin G-like 3Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G1103R1103Laminin G-like 3Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C1218F1218EGF-like 17Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C1218Y1218EGF-like 17Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 C1229S1229EGF-like 17Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 G1288S1288EGF-like 18Disease-causing (★★)
CRB1 P1381L1381Interaction with EPB41L5Disease-causing (★★)
RPE65 Y249C249Disease-causing (★★)

Showing 60 of 183.

Uncertain variants in Leber congenital amaurosis that look disease-causing

VariantPositionProtein partClinical labelEvidence
RPE65 F70V70Conflicting reports (★)+7: 2 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; F70S at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 6.6e-06 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.942
CRB1 G1288D1288EGF-like 18Conflicting reports (★)+7: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; G1288S at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 6.6e-06 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.779
CRB1 C394Y394EGF-like 9Conflicting reports (★)+7: 2 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; C394F at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 0 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.921
CRB1 G899V899EGF-like 13Conflicting reports (★)+7: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; G899A at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 6.8e-07 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.864
CRB1 C438Y438EGF-like 10Conflicting reports (★)+7: C438S at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 6.8e-07 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.945
CRB1 G615D615Laminin G-like 1Conflicting reports (★)+7: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; G615V at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 6.6e-06 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.795
CRB1 C939Y939EGF-like 14Conflicting reports (★)+7: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; C939R at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 6.6e-06 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.859
CRB1 C1218S1218EGF-like 17Conflicting reports (★)+7: 2 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; C1218F at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 6.6e-06 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.961
CRB1 C1218G1218EGF-like 17Conflicting reports (★)+7: 2 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; C1218F at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 6.9e-07 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.939
CRB1 C163G163EGF-like 4Uncertain (★)+7: 2 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; C163F at the same position is pathogenic; seen in 3.4e-06 of gnomAD DNA copies; REVEL 0.925
CRB1 C896F896EGF-like 13Conflicting reports (★)+6: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; C896S at the same position is pathogenic; not seen in the gnomAD population database; AlphaMissense 0.95
CRB1 C896Y896EGF-like 13Conflicting reports (★)+6: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; C896S at the same position is pathogenic; not seen in the gnomAD population database; AlphaMissense 0.95
CRB1 C1285G1285EGF-like 18Conflicting reports (★)+6: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; C1285R at the same position is pathogenic; not seen in the gnomAD population database; AlphaMissense 0.93
CRB1 I1100R1100Laminin G-like 3Conflicting reports (★)+6: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; I1100T at the same position is pathogenic; not seen in the gnomAD population database; AlphaMissense 0.77
CRX R43L43HomeoboxUncertain (★)+6: 7 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; R43H at the same position is pathogenic; REVEL 0.970

Which prediction tools work for Leber congenital amaurosis

How often each tool ranks a disease-causing variant above a harmless one (AUROC × 100).

Same protein, different disease

Diseases related to Leber congenital amaurosis

Frequently asked questions

Which genes are linked to Leber congenital amaurosis?

In CATVariant, Leber congenital amaurosis is linked to 6 analyzed proteins: CRB1 (Protein crumbs homolog 1), RPE65 (Retinoid isomerohydrolase), CRX (Cone-rod homeobox protein), CEP290 (Centrosomal protein of 290 kDa), ALMS1 (Centrosome-associated protein ALMS1) and ABCA4 (Retinal-specific phospholipid-transporting ATPase ABCA4).

How many genetic variants are linked to Leber congenital amaurosis?

1,279 variants: 183 are classified as disease-causing (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) in ClinVar and 947 are of uncertain significance or have conflicting reports.

Which uncertain variants in Leber congenital amaurosis look disease-causing?

15 uncertain variants reach the likely-pathogenic range of the ACMG/AMP points scale on computable evidence, for example RPE65 F70V, CRB1 G1288D, CRB1 C394Y, CRB1 G899V and CRB1 C438Y. These are leads for expert review, not diagnoses.

Which variant effect predictor works best for Leber congenital amaurosis?

Among tools not trained on clinical labels, AlphaMissense separates this disease's known disease-causing variants from harmless ones best (AUROC 0.96, based on 28 disease-causing and 29 harmless variants).

About this data

Variant–disease links come from ClinVar, Open Targets and UniProt, pooled from the latest public CATVariant analysis of each human protein. Evidence scores use the ACMG/AMP Bayesian points scale with computable criteria only (position among known disease variants, rarity in gnomAD, calibrated predictors, deep mutational scanning); there is no family or patient data, so they prioritise variants for expert review and never classify them.

Download every variant as CSV · Browse all diseases · Methods · About the Center