Desminopathy: genes and variants

Explore variant evidence for Desminopathy across 4 analyzed proteins (DES, FLNC, BAG3, LDB3). Linked ClinVar records include 50 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, 2,721 variants of uncertain significance and 447 with conflicting classifications.

Coverage includes proteins already analyzed in CATVariant, not every gene involved in this condition. Database links are associations, not an assessment of clinical gene–disease validity. Computable evidence prioritizes variants for expert review and does not reclassify them. Source labels are pooled across this disease family.

Data updated 2026-10-10. Automated aggregation, not a clinical review date.

Download variant evidence (CSV)

Genes linked to Desminopathy

Where Desminopathy variants cluster

ClinVar pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants linked to Desminopathy

VariantPositionProtein partClinical label
BAG3 P209S209Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
BAG3 P209L209Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES E401D401IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES E401G401IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES K449T449Interaction with CRYABPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES N116S116IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES A120P120IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES L338R338IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES L345P345IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES R406W406IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES S12F12HeadPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES L377P377IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES H384R384IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES R454W454TailPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
LDB3 A145T145Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
BAG3 E455K455BAGPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
BAG3 P470S470BAGPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES S2I2HeadPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES S13F13HeadPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES E245D245IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES R350P350IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES L370P370IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES E413K413IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES P419S419TailPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
FLNC M222V222Calponin-homology (CH) 2Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
FLNC A1186V1186Filamin 10Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
FLNC V2297M2297Filamin 20Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES T442I442Interaction with CRYABPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★★)
DES L115F115IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES L115I115IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES L338P338IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
BAG3 P209Q209Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES E401K401IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES R127C127IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
FLNC G1424V1424Filamin 12Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES A120D120IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES Q348P348IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES R406P406IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES R383P383IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES L274P274IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES N342D342IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES L352S352IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
FLNC G1546D1546Filamin 14Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
FLNC A1895P1895Filamin 17Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES M1T1Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES A317P317IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
FLNC V2328M2328Filamin 21Pathogenic / likely pathogenic (★)
DES A285V285IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic
DES A360P360IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic
DES Q389P389IF rodPathogenic / likely pathogenic

Uncertain variants prioritized for review in Desminopathy

VariantPositionProtein partClinical labelEvidence
DES R383H383IF rodConflicting reports (★)+6: 2 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; R383P at the same position is pathogenic; REVEL 0.832
DES R350W350IF rodConflicting reports (★)+6: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; R350P at the same position is pathogenic; REVEL 0.853
DES L115P115IF rodUncertain (★)+6: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; L115F at the same position is pathogenic; REVEL 0.992
DES R350Q350IF rodUncertain (★★)+6: 3 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; R350P at the same position is pathogenic; REVEL 0.813
DES R383C383IF rodUncertain (★★)+6: 2 other pathogenic changes within 3 positions; R383P at the same position is pathogenic; REVEL 0.777

Which prediction tools work for Desminopathy

Observed separation of ClinVar pathogenic / likely pathogenic from benign / likely benign variants (AUROC × 100). This benchmark is not a clinical recommendation.

Same protein, different disease

Diseases related to Desminopathy

Frequently asked questions

Which genes have records linked to Desminopathy?

This view contains 4 analyzed proteins: DES, FLNC, BAG3, LDB3. Links come from clinical records and association databases. They do not imply that every listed gene is a validated cause, and missing genes may not yet be analyzed.

What do the clinical classifications mean?

Linked records include 50 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, 2,721 variants of uncertain significance and 447 with conflicting classifications. Labels summarize source records; multi-condition records may not make a separate assertion for this disease. Check the original record and review status.

Does the evidence score change a VUS classification?

No. 5 VUS or conflicting variants reach the likely-pathogenic points range on the computable criteria available here. This is a research prioritization signal, not a clinical classification. Patient, family and other required evidence may be missing.

Can I download the variant evidence?

Download the CSV for all 3,430 variants in the selected disease scope, including clinical labels, review status, evidence criteria, predictor scores, functional measurements and population frequency where available.

About this data

Variant–disease links come from ClinVar, Open Targets and UniProt, pooled from eligible public CATVariant analyses of each human protein. Evidence scores use the ACMG/AMP Bayesian points scale with computable criteria only (position among known disease variants, rarity in gnomAD, calibrated predictors, deep mutational scanning); there is no family or patient data, so they prioritise variants for expert review and never classify them.

Download every variant as CSV · Browse all diseases · Methods · About the Center